ArpexCapital

Dream, People, Culture

The Biggest News Story of 2009 (and Predictions for 2010)

THE BIGGEST STORY OF 2009

My family has a tradition in which, sometime before midnight on New Years Eve, each person chooses the biggest news story of the ending year and makes one prediction for the coming year.

Regarding the biggest Brazil-related news story of 2009, there were several to choose from, including the still-unsolved tragedy of the Air France flight from Rio, the award of the 2016 Olympics, the rise of Sino-Brazilian relationships  (China passed the US as Brazil’s largest trading partner) and the unfortunate Goldman-Bianchi custody battle.

In my opinion, however, the biggest Brazil-related biggest news story was not a single definable event but rather 2009 as the year in which Brazil took its place as an economic powerhouse on the world stage.  In 2009, the world realized that Brazil’s legendary potential had become real.

2009 was also the year that Brazilians themselves accepted this new reality: some of the biggest skeptics of Brazil’s rise have been Brazilians themselves, who have been jaded by the country’s previous false starts but there are few skeptics left.

In the beginning of 2009, when I told people that I do business in Brazil, I often got blank stares or some form of the question, “Why?”   By the end of the 2009, I got eager looks and some form of the question, “Can you tell me more?”

PREDICTION FOR 2010

Regarding predictions for 2010, I have nothing too creative.  My primary call for 2010 is that the Brazilian IPO market will come back strongly, which will lead to large gains for private equity firms and drive further investment in Brazil-related private equity funds.  This momentum will eventually drive investment in select venture funds, as well.

On the negative side, I feel concerned about further measures Brazil may take to prevent the appreciation of its currency.  The goal is to help Brazilian exporters, which is understandable (stronger currency = more expensive products = less exports).  The recent 2% tax on foreign investment, however, came as a surprise and a reminder of the risk of sudden changes in the rules.

The US will sputter along, with tepid growth derived almost solely from profligate government spending.  Underlying economic fundamentals in the US are and will remain very poor.  High levels of public spending, necessary to prevent financial collapse in late 2008 and early 2009, has recently devolved into the creation of massive new entitlement programs (e.g., healthcare) that we cannot afford at this time.

The world has begun to realize that the America’s balance sheet is not healthy – even China, the largest purchaser of US government bonds, has begun to get indigestion.  Soon we will have to pay significantly highest interest rates to entice buyers to purchase our debt.

US citizens can look forward to a crushing debt burden and damaging inflation but those are probably 2011-2012 issues.

All the more reason to focus on Brazil for the next few years.

Personally, I feel grateful to be connected to two wonderful countries that, despite some near-term challenges for the US, have a wonderful long-term future.

Happy New Year – Feliz Ano Novo!!

December 29, 2009 at 11:46 Comments (5)

Brazil Passing Venezuela and Mexico in Oil

BRAZIL NEARS TOP SPOT IN LATIN OIL OUTPUT

Wall Street Journal
December 18, 2009
By Jeff Fick and Laurence Iliff

RIO DE JANEIRO — Brazil is poised to overtake longtime energy powerhouses Mexico and Venezuela as Latin America’s biggest oil producer, a result of both political flexibility and natural resources.

Trends suggest Brazil could rise to the top of the heap by 2011, as its ultra-deep offshore fields start producing in the months ahead.

Meanwhile, Mexico and Venezuela have seen crude-oil output drop dramatically in recent years. Traditionally high oil production in those countries made state-owned oil companies complacent, said David Shields, an independent energy analyst in Mexico City.

“Basically, the reason is that Brazil had a crisis to deal with in energy and Venezuela and Mexico never did,” said Mr. Shields.

Brazilian state-run energy giant Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras, was forced to adapt to free-market pressures in the mid-1990s when former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso opened Brazil’s oil industry, a Petrobras monopoly, to private competition.

The result was a wave of exploration, with production surging by about 50% since 2000. Petrobras, responsible for more than 95% of Brazil’s output, produced just over two million barrels a day in November.

Petrobras’s daily output, including production of natural gas and operations outside of Brazil, amounts to about 2.6 million barrels of oil equivalent, up 5.5% from a year ago.

The trend is for Brazil’s crude-oil output to keep growing as the offshore “subsalt” fields — where oil is buried under more than four miles of water, rock, sand and salt — start producing. Petrobras has targeted domestic output of 2.25 million barrels a day for 2010, growing to 2.43 million in 2011.

On Thursday, U.S. companies Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Devon Energy Corp. said their joint project struck oil for a second time in the subsalt region of Brazil’s Campos Basin.

Another offshore area, the Tupi field, is the Western Hemisphere’s largest discovery since Mexico’s Cantarell in 1976. Tupi is estimated to hold between five billion and eight billion barrels of oil equivalent, and pilot production is expected to yield about 120,000 barrels a day in little more than a year.

Things are headed in the other direction in Mexico, which has struggled with declining output and little new development. Mexico’s crude oil output has dropped from a peak of 3.4 million barrels a day in 2004 to an average of 2.6 million barrels a day in the first 10 months of 2009. Production will likely come in at 2.5 million barrels a day in 2010.

The key factor was a steep dropoff at Cantarell, for years the cash cow for state-owned Petróleos Mexicanos. Cantarell averaged just 639,000 barrels per day in October, down from 947,000 a year ago and 2.2 million in 2004. The decline is expected to continue into 2010, though Pemex is also making forays into the Gulf of Mexico, where other oil companies, including Petrobras with private partners, have had success.

Despite moderate overhauls in 2008 designed to increase the scope of oil-services deals, Pemex has been unable to follow the lead of Petrobras and increase foreign cooperation — including entering the kind of deep-water, shared-risk contracts that have helped Brazilian production.

Pemex also has to fund more than a third of Mexico’s federal budget, limiting its own ability to invest in itself. Efforts to loosen the reins have been hampered by political gridlock.

The production decline in Venezuela, which holds enough reserves to put the country into the same league as Saudi Arabia, has been primarily self-inflicted.

President Hugo Chávez has diverted billions of dollars of profits from state-run Petroleos de Venezuela SA, also known as PdVSA, to welfare programs, hurting the company’s ability to invest. That has led to Venezuela’s crude-oil output sliding more than 700,000 barrels a day over the past decade.

As a member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, Venezuela is also subject to the group’s quota restrictions. The International Energy Agency says Venezuela produced 2.22 million barrels a day in November, and OPEC offers a similar estimate. Venezuela, disputes that figure, saying daily output is closer to 3.1 million barrels.

Brazil has been invited to join OPEC, but declined.

PdVSA’s 2009 investment budget amounts to around 20% of Petrobras’s, suggesting Venezuelan output will continue to sink while Brazil rises.

—Dan Molinski in Caracas contributed to this article.

December 18, 2009 at 22:46 Comments (0)

Speed and Simplicity

Picture 5

portables_macbookpro20090828

Picture 7

A few weeks ago my PC died and, for the first time since 1994, I purchased a Mac. Although it felt risky to go with a Mac, given that the majority of my colleagues still use PCs, I just couldn’t take Windows anymore. My primary complaint? After starting or restarting my laptop, it took eight minutes for my laptop to boot up. Of course, the amount of third-party programs slowed the boot up time but so what? I will always have lots of programs on my computer.

Time is the most valuable resource in life today. “Time is money” but is also family, health and overall sanity. There is never enough of it and I can’t tolerate products that waste it, which Windows does. Assuming an average of 1 restart per day: 8 minutes per day x 365 days = 2920 minutes = 48 hours / 8 hours per workday = six workdays per year waiting for a computer to load!

In fairness to Microsoft, they do some great things – I use Excel almost everyday and am frequently reminded of it’s power and effectiveness. I find myself trending, however, towards any product that saves time – that usually means any product that is “simplified”.

A Mac is simple. The iPhone is simple. iTunes is simple. I use them all everyday.

Who else has mastered the art of speed and simplicity? Google, for one. Do you remember Alta Vista, Lycos, Hot Bot, Web Crawler, Infoseek, etc.? Google demolished them, along with Yahoo and Explorer. Google provided better results but I also think it had a lot to do with simplicity: while everyone else was loading their home page with links and ads, Google had white space and a search bar.

I would argue that Facebook has also won with simplicity – it is cleaner and less cluttered than MySpace.

Speed and simplicity. Any product that saves time, relative to competitors, will gain momentum; any product that costs time will lose. A simple user interface will win over cluttered one.

It seems obvious but it’s amazing how few companies seem to appreciate it.

December 16, 2009 at 07:06 Comments (3)

CNBC Interview on Tech Investing in Brazil


December 13, 2009 at 08:57 Comment (1)